Central Administrative Tribunal

Riyaz Ahmed Nabilal Chandarki vs CENTRAL RAILWAY on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 8 O.A./491/2026 (MUMBAI) [ ARREARS ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 5 No of Adjournment: 5 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 RIYAZ AHMED NABILAL CHANDARKI Vs CENTRAL RAILWAY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri D.N. Karande For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Umesh Gupta i/b Ms. Sangeeta Yadav Order of The Tribunal Proxy counsel appears on behalf of the Advocate-on-record and submits that Ms. Sangeeta Yadav has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondents in this case and seeks four weeks' time to file memo of appearance as well as reply.

2. Considering the same, time is granted by the next date.

3. List the case on 30th November, 2026 for recording compliance.

Sanveet Yadav Deputy Registrar Deepti Munarshi ( )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead