Central Administrative Tribunal
PURUSHOTHAMAN P vs UT OF PUDUCHERRY on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI Order Sheet Item no.: 8 O.A./1472/2025 (CHENNAI) [ REGULARIZATION-CL ] Along With Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 8 Order Dated: 03/11/2026 PURUSHOTHAMAN P Vs UT OF PUDUCHERRY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : MR.V.AJAYAKUMAR
For Respondent(s) Advocate : MR.R.SYED MUSTAFA Order of The Tribunal CFA present. CFR represented and seeks further time to file reply. It is observed that vide order dated 25.09.2026, four weeks time was granted finally to file reply and it was ordered by this Tribunal that if reply is not filed by the next date of hearing, cost will be imposed. Even then, it is observed that reply is not filed and counsel representing CFR is seeking further time. Since reply is not filed despite taking sufficient time, a cost of Rs. 10,000/- shall be paid by the respondent and the same shall be deposited with the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority. Registry shall accept the reply only after production of the receipt showing such deposit. List the matter on 16.12.2026. Veena Kothavale Member (J) Lokesh
( steno 'c' )