Armed Forces Tribunal

Raghbir Singh vs Union of India on 29 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH CHANDIGARH

AT CHANDIMANDIR

-.-

OA 989 of 2026

Thursday, the 29th day of Oct, 2026

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL, MEMBER (J)

HON'BLE LT GEN (DR) RANBIR SINGH, MEMBER (A)

Raghbir Singh

…… Applicant

(By JP Sharma, Advocate, through VC)

Versus

Union of India and others

…… Respondents

(By Mr. Jagjot Singh Lalli, Dy. Solicitor General of India , through VC )

-.-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The applicant was invalided from service on 18.10.1977. Total service rendered by him was 06 years, 03 months and 17 days. The invalidment was the result of disability of ‘Epileptic Fits’, the extent of which was assessed to be 30% for two years but neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service. Despite the disability being neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service, a claim for grant of disability element was preferred by the Records Office. The Chief Controller of Defence Accounts(P) accepted the claim by treating the disability to be attributable to military service. The applicant has thus been in receipt of disability pension from 19.10.1977 till 28.11.1985.

For more than 35 years, the applicant did not pursue his claim. Somehow a Re-Assessment Medical Board (RAMB) was conducted on 31.05.2023 which assessed the extent of disability to be 20% for the intervening period and 10% for life. The applicant has thus demanded grant of disability pension for the intervening period but requisite benefit has not been released to the applicant. PCDA(P) Prayagraj has issued a letter dated 01.09.2025 raising certain objections.

OA 989 of 2026

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in view of the finding of RAMB dated 31.05.2023, PCDA(P) Prayagraj could not have objected to the claim. Notice. Mr. Jagjot Singh Lalli, Dy. Solicitor General of India accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and waives service and seeks time to file reply. Adjourned to 16.04.2027.

(Lt Gen (Dr) Ranbir Singh)

(Justice Sudhir Mittal) Member (A)

Member (J)

29thOct, 2026 DK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead