Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/1171/2011 on 28 December 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1171 of 2011-B &
Connected matters
Decided on 28.12.2012
________________________________________________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 1171 of 2011-B
Roshan Lal son of Sh. Devi Ram, resident of Village Banli, P.O. Chandi, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P., presently working as Driver in the Himachal Pradesh University, Summerhill, Shimla-5.
.......Petitioner Versus
Summerhill, Shimla-5.
5. .......Respondents
2. CWP No. 1227 of 2011-B
Devinder Kumar son of Sh.Puria C/o Sainoo Panwar, House No. 39/2, near Police Post Jutogh, District Shimla, presently working as Driver in the Himachal Pradesh University, Summerhill, Shimla-5.
…Petitioner
Versus
1. Himachal Pradesh University through its Registrar, Summerhill, Shimla-5.
5. …Respondents
3. CWP No. 1226 of 2011
Revti Nandan son of Sh. Roop Dev, village Dev Dhar Patehvahan, P.O. Taliyar, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi, HP presently working as Driver in the Himachal Pradesh University Summerhill Shimla-5.
..Petitioner
Versus
1. Himachal Pradesh University through its Registrar, Summerhill, Shimla-5.
High Court of H.P. 2012:HHC:12304 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 11:59:15 :::CIS
5. …Respondents.
Civil Writ Petitions under Article 226
of Constitution of India ________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
_________________________________________________________
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. B.C. Negi, for respondent No.
1. Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate,
ror respondent No. 2. __________________________________________ _________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral):
Mr. Subhash Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), on the basis of instructions imparted to him by his client(s) prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petitions. Consequently, the present petitions are disposed of as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs.
December 28, 2012
(Rajiv Sharma),
( Kalpana)
Judge
High Court of H.P. 2012:HHC:12304 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 11:59:15 :::CIS