Calcutta High Court
WRIT PETITION None on 2 November 2016
18.02.2025Ct. No.33Sl.No.2
cmWPA 17867 of 2013
CAN 1 of 2014 (Old No. CAN 3203/2014)
CAN 2 of 2016 (Old No. CAN 11364/2016)
Nihar Ranjan Kanjilal
Vs
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Malay DharMr. Biswajit Sarkar
…. for the petitioner
Mr. Arup Nath BhattacharyyaMs. Saswati Chatterjee Mr. Hemanta Kumar Das … for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3
In Re: CAN 2 of 2016 (Old No. CAN 11364 of 2016)
The learned advocates for the petitioner as well as respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are present.
The application being CAN 2 of 2016 (Old No. CAN
11364 of 2016) has been taken up for hearing.
The learned advocate representing the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 submitted that the petitioner had been procrastinating the hearing of the instant writ petition and opposed the application for restoration.
Based on the averments made in paragraph Nos. 3 and 5 of the aforesaid CAN application and the explanation stated therein to be satisfactory and for ends of justice, the restoration application being CAN 2 of 2016 (Old No. CAN 11364 of 2016) stands allowed.
The instant writ petition stands restored to its original file and number. The order dated 02.11.2016 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court is recalled.
In Re: CAN 1 of 2014 (Old No. CAN 3203/2014)
Page 1 of 2
The learned advocate for the petitioner has filed an application being CAN 1 of 2014 (Old No. CAN 3203/2014) inter alia praying for expeditious disposal of the instant writ petition and the same is allowed.
The application being CAN 1 of 2014 (Old No. CAN 3203/2014) is disposed of.
The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that the pleadings have been completed and the writ petition is ready for hearing.
Let the matter be fixed on 5[th] May, 2025.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…