Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/11358/2011 on 29 December 2012

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

CWP No. 11358 of 2011-F.

Decided on: December 29, 2011.

Smt. Rekha wife of Shri Naresh Kumar, resident of village and P.O. Shillai, Tehsil Shillai, District Sirmour, H.P.

……….Petitioner.

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Himachal Pradesh through its Secretary (Social Justice and Empowerment) to the Govt. of H.P., Shimla-2.

2. The Director (Social Justice and Empowerment), Himachal pradesh, Shimla-9.

3. The Child Development Project Officer, Block Shillai at Shillai, District Sirmour, H.P.

4. Smt. Sheela Devi wife of Shri Bhagat Singh, resident of village and P.O. Shillai, Tehsil Shillai, Distt. Sirmour, H.P.

……….Respondents.

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge.

For the petitioner:

Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate. For the respondents:

Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG & Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.AG for respondents No. 1 to 3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)

The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “(i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing respondents No. 1 to 3 to implement the order dated 17.8.2011 (Annexure P-8) and offer appointment to the petitioner as Anganwari Helper in Anganwari Centre.”

2. In the nature of the order, we propose to pass in this case, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case. According to the petitioner, Sheela High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11739-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 23:13:51 :::CIS

2 Devi is not interested in joining duty and she has given an affidavit Annexure P-9. According to the learned Deputy AG, the same is not properly prepared affidavit and cannot be accepted. The petitioner may present herself along with said Smt. Sheela Devi before the third respondent on 2.1.2012. The third respondent shall ascertain the correctness of the affidavit filed by the 4th respondent and in case the 4th respondent is not willing to join duty, the petitioner being the next candidate in the merit list shall be appointed on the same day.

3. Authenticated copy to the petitioner to be produced before the CDPO, Shillai, District Sirmour, H.P.

4. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.

(Justice Kurian Joseph),

Chief Justice.

December 29, 2011,

( Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (karan/vs)

Judge.

High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11739-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 23:13:51 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead