Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/11568/2011 on 29 December 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA.
CWP No. 11568 of 2011-G
Decided on: 29.12.2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sh. Parshotam Lal, S/o Sh. Sukh Ram, R/o Village Hara, Post Office Fatehpur, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P.
2. Arun Kumar, S/o Sh. Hari Karihan, R/o Village & Post Office Amarpur, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. ....Petitioners Versus
1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary Education, Government of H.P. Shimla-2.
2. Director of Elementary Education to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1. ....Respondents Civil Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Bansal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General, Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Ramesh
Thakur,
Assistant Advocate General.
Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
The petitioners are para teachers. They are aggrieved since they are not paid the vacation salary and other High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11723-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 23:15:00 :::CIS
benefits as are paid to the contract teachers. In the judgment dated 21.10.2010, in CWP No. 2880 of 2010 titled as Dhananjay Saini versus State of H.P. & ors., and connected cases, this Court has held that para teachers are entitled to all the emoluments as are paid to contract teachers, because as per the Government policy, they are to be treated similarly for all purposes. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to pay the eligible vacation salary, during the entire service period to the petitioners, in case the same has not been granted so far, in view of the judgment of this Court in Baldev Singh & others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008, on production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition and a copy of the judgment, referred to above. If the amounts are not disbursed, as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officer responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same.
2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph),
Chief Justice.
December 29, 2011 (Justice Dev Dasrshan Sud), ( ms/hl) Judge.
High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11723-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 23:15:00 :::CIS