Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/1348/2011 on 28 December 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 1348 of 2011
Date of Decision : December 28, 2011
Sh. Ashwani Kumar S/o Sh. Netar Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. Bhararu, Tehsil Joginder Nagar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh.
Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Cooperation) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2.
2. The Registrar Co-operative Societies, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
Respondents
Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents on the grounds mentioned in the body of the writ petition.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.
For the respondents : Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents.
Justice Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral)
According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, matter in issue is squarely covered by the decisions rendered by the Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11624 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 23:16:03 :::CIS
2 Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2864 of 2009, titled as Mohammad Akram versus State of H.P. & another, decided on 5.5.2011; CWP No. 2466 of 2010, titled as Hem Raj versus State of H.P. & others, decided on 28.10.2010; and CWP No. 10573 of 2011, titled as Kulwant Singh versus Principal Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs to the Government of H.P. & others, decided on 9.12.2011, copies of which are taken on record.
2. Facts being identical, hence directions issued in Mohammad Akram (supra), Hem Raj (supra) and Kulwant Singh (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to the instant case also. Consequential action shall positively be taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the judgment.
Petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Justice Sanjay Karol),
Judge. December 28 , 2011 (PK)
High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11624 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 23:16:03 :::CIS