Madras High Court
CRL OP/19296/2025 of Indumathi Vs The Inspector of police on 3 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH
CRL OP No. 19296 of 2025
Indumathi,
W/o.Dayalan,
No.129, Dharmaraja Koil Street,
Paranur,
Chengalpattu District. ...Petitioner/De-facto complainant
Vs
1.The Inspector of Police,
Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station,
Chengalpattu District,
In Crime No.852 of 2024.
2. Dilli,
S/o.Elumalai,
No.84/132, Mariyamman Koil Street,
Paranur Village, Chengalpattu District.
3.Padmanabhan,
S/o.Manavalan,
No.16/8, Pudhu Nesavalar Street,
Mangalampet, Cuddalore District.
4.Susila, W/o.Dilli
5.Gayathiri, D/o.Dilli ...Respondent No.2 to 5/Petitioner/Accused No.1 to 4
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, to cancel the Anticipatory Bail dated 07.01.2025 granted in Crl.M.P.No.89 of 2025
on the file of Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu.
For Petitioner(s) :
For R1 :
Mr.Ali Hassan Khan
Mr.R.Rajasekaran,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
For R3 & R5 :
For R2&R4 :
Mr.M.Jaisingh
Notice served -No appearance
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483(3) of the BNSS, seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the accused by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu, in Crl.M.P.No.89 of 2025, dated 07.01.2025.
2. It is not in dispute that the anticipatory bail was granted to the accused subject to the certain conditions. It is also not disputed that the accused has complied with the bail conditions imposed by the Court.
3. There is no allegation that the accused has violaged any of the conditions imposed by the Court while granting anticipatory bail. The only allegation raised in this petition is that, subsequent to the grant of anticipatory bail, the accused threatened and harassed the de-facto complainant.
4. In such circumstances, the appropriate remedy available to the de-facto complainant is to lodge a separate complaint before the jurisdictional police and prosecute the accused for the alleged subsequent occurrence.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that no complaint has been received from the de-facto complainant so far in respect of the alleged threat and harassment.
6. In view of the above circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03-11-2026 nvi To
1. The Inspector of Police, Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station, Chengalpattu District,
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
N.RAMESH, J. nvi CRL OP No.
19296
of 202
03-11