Madras High Court
SA/242/2016 of J.YUVARAJ Vs M.SEKAR on 3 November 2026
S.A. No.242 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.11.2026
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
S.A. No.242 of 2016
J. Yuvaraj
… Appellant
Vs.
1. M. Sekar
2. M. Balakrishnan
3. M. Prabhakaran
4. M. Perumal
... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed Under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 28.10.2015 passed in A.S.No.15 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Tiruvallur, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 14.03.2011 in O.S.No.338 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruvallur.
For Appellant
:
M/s. V. Srimathi
For Respondents
:
Mr. M.R. Khapali
*****
S.A. No.242 of 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Earlier on 27.10.2026, based on the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, for taking steps for the deceased sole appellant in this appeal, this matter has been adjourned today. Even today, the learned counsel for the appellant had once again sought time for taking steps for the deceased sole appellant in this appeal.
2. On perusal of the docket sheet, it reveals that the learned counsel for the appellant had sought several adjournments from the month of July 2026, for taking steps for the deceased sole appellant in this appeal, however no steps have been taken till date.
3. Considering the fact that the appeal is of the year 2016 and already, twice the matter was listed under the caption “for dismissal” and also the fact that no steps have been taken for the deceased sole appellant in this appeal, which shows that the legal representatives of the deceased appellants are not interested to proceed with this appeal, this Court is inclined to dismiss this second appeal for default.
S.A. No.242 of 2016
4. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition if any, stands closed. No costs. 03.11.2026 stn Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No To:
1. The Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur.
2. The District Munsif, Tiruvallur.
3. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.
S.A. No.242 of 2016 K. RAJASEKAR, J. stn S.A. No.242 of 2016 03.11.2026