Madras High Court

WP(MD)/31272/2026 of Vellaisamy Vs The District Collector on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 31272 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 03-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 31272 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011554622026}

Vellaisamy,

Chokkampatti,

Ayanporuvai Village,

Marungapuri Taluk,

Tiruchirappalli District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector,

Tiruchirappalli District,

Tiruchirappalli.

2. The District Revenue Officer,

Tiruchirappalli District,

Tiruchirappalli.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Srirangam,

Tiruchirappalli District.

4. The Tahsildar,

Tiruchirappalli District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal dated 06.10.2026, in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2026, the Certificate of the Village Administrative Officer and the Revenue Inspector and the statement of the villagers, by a

WP(MD) No. 31272 of 2026

reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, so as to correct the entry Murugan Kovil in the village accounts and UDR

map of Survey No.441/9, Ayanporuvai Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, as Sri Vellachi Vadugachi Amman Kovil, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner

: M/s.P.Kalaiyarasi Bharathi

For Respondents

: Mr.S.Iniyan Karthik

Government Advocate

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The petitioner had lodged an appeal before the District Revenue Officer for correction of the entry “Murugan Kovil” in the village accounts and the UDR Map in respect of Survey No.441/9 and for the incidental and ancillary reliefs thereto.

2. Accepting notice for all the respondents, Mr.S.Iniyan Karthik, learned Government Advocate, submits that the second respondent would consider and dispose of the appeal within two months.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and to any other

WP(MD) No. 31272 of 2026 persons who would be affected by such order. There shall be no order as to costs. 03-11-2026 Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation: No JEN To

1. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli District.

4. The Tahsildar, Marungapuri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.

WP(MD) No. 31272 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. JEN WP(MD) No. 31272 of 2026 03-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead