Madras High Court
CONT P/4038/2026 of R.Balasubramanian Vs Raman and 2 others on 2 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02-11-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
CONT P No.4038 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012379902026}
1. R.Balasubramanian
Petitioner(s)
Vs
1.Mr.Raman,
The Managing Director, SIPCOT Ltd.,
No.19-A,
Rukmani Lakshmipathi Road, Egmore,
Chennai-600 008.
2.Mrs.Snekha
The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.
3.Mr.Jayavel
The Tahsildar, Land Acquisition,
SIPCOT-TACIT Division, Oragadam Scheme,
Irunkattukottai,
Now At Pillaipakkam SIPCOT-TACIT
Division, Pillaipakkam,
Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kanchipuram District.
Contemnor(s)
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 08:48:13 pm )
CONT P No. 4038 of 2026
PRAYER: This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to take appropriate action against the Respondents 1 to 3 for contempt of Court for disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.No.10690
of 2024 dated 10.11.2025
For Petitioner:
Mr.R.Balasubramanian
For Respondent:
Mr.M.Sivavarthanan
Special Government Pleader
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 10.11.2025 in W.P.No.10690 of 2024, directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 28.12.2026.
2. Mr.M.Sivavarthanan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, would submit that, by proceedings in Na.Ka.No.52/2025/TACIT Division, dated 18.12.2025, the direction issued by this Court has been complied with. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that a copy of the order has not been furnished to the petitioner.
3. In view of the submission made by the petitioner that a copy of the order has not been received, the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the order to the petitioner within a period of one week. If the petitioner is aggrieved
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 08:48:13 pm )
CONT P No. 4038 of 2026 by the order passed by the respondent, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law. No further orders are necessary. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed. 02-11-2026 r n s
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 08:48:13 pm )
CONT P No. 4038 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. r n s CONT P No.4038 of 2026
02-11-2026
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 08:48:13 pm )