Madras High Court

CRL A(MD)/1141/2024 of Yegappan Vs Lalitha on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL A(MD) No. 1141 of 2024

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 02-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.LINGESWARAN

CRL A(MD) No. 1141 of 2024

CNR:{HCMD011217822024}

Yegappan

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

Lalitha

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This petition is filed under Section 415 of BNSS Act, to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 09.09.2024 made in Crl.MP.No.15810 of 2024 in CC.No.362 of 2016 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.2, Trichy, set aside the same and directing to return the original documents in Ex.P8, P9, P11 & P12.

For Appellant(s)

:M/s V.S. Kumara Guru

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

This petition has been filed to quash the impugned order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Trichy, in Crl.MP.No.15810 of 2024 in CC.No.362 of 2016, dated 09.09.2024 and direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Trichy, to return the original documents in Exs.P8, P9, P11 & P12.

CRL A(MD) No. 1141 of 2024

2. The appellant originally filed a case in C.C.No.362 of 2016 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirappalli, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which resulted in the conviction of the respondent herein. The respondent filed an appeal in Cr.A.No.70 of 2021 against the conviction before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli. During the pendency of the said appeal, the matter was settled out of Court. The appellant herein received the entire cheque amount and settled the issues. Therefore, the learned Appellate Judge set aside the conviction and sentence imposed upon the respondent herein.

3. Thereafter, the petitioner herein filed an application in Crl.M.P.No.15810 of 2024 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy, seeking the return of Exs.P8, P9, P11 and P12. However, the learned Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petition on the ground that no reason had been assigned for the return of the documents.

4. This Court carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner herein and perused the materials available on record.

CRL A(MD) No. 1141 of 2024

5. The documents marked as the exhibits mentioned above relate to the appellant's business, and he requires them for his reference. There is no dispute that all four documents belong to the appellant. Therefore, there is no reason for the Trial Court to retain those documents.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed, and the impugned order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy, in Crl.M.P.No.15810 of 2024 in C.C.No.362 of 2016, dated 09.09.2024, is hereby set aside.

7. The documents, namely, Exs.P8, P9, P11 and P12, are directed to be returned to the appellant upon substitution of certified copies thereof. 02-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DSS

CRL A(MD) No. 1141 of 2024 D.LINGESWARAN, J. DSS To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Trichy. Copy To : Section Officer ( VR Section ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court CRL A(MD) No. 1141 of 2024 02-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead