Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/20603/2026 of Lakshmi Vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai on 2 November 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 20603 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 20603 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011299432026}
Lakshmi
W/o. Late. V.S. Ramasubramaniya Iyyar,
Anbu Iyyar Compound,
No. 84/4,
Agraharam Street,
Vilacheri, Thirupparankundram Taluk,
Madurai District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Madurai.
2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thirunagar Police Station, Madurai District.
3. Rasu @ Mayan
S/o. Mayan,
No. 1/11,
Joseph Nagar, Thirunagar,
Thirupparankundram Taluk,
Madurai District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd respondent to give adequate police protection to life and limb of the petitioner and her family on the basis of the petitioner’s representation dated 19.08.2026.
For Petitioner(s)
:M/s K.P.S.ILANGOVELRAJAN
__________
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 03:17:22 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 20603 of 2026
For Respondent(s)
:MR.P.VETRIVEL,
GOVT.ADVOCATE
(CRL.SIDE)FOR R1 AND R2
MR.J.MATHESH
FOR R3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking a direction as against the 2nd respondent to give adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her family members based on the petitioner’s representation dated 19.08.2026.
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is in occupation of the property stands in the name of three sons of the deceased Advocate Mr.V.S.R.Ramasubramanian and according to the petitioner, she is a tenant.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that the 3rd respondent has been orally nominated as a supervisor to collect rent from the tenants and any proceedings for evicting the petitioner will be initiated by the legal heirs of the said Mr.V.S.R.Ramasubramanian.
4. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent further submits that the allegation as against the 3rd respondent that he is threatening the petitioner __________
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 03:17:22 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 20603 of 2026 is actually incorrect. In such circumstances, he seeks for dismissing this petition.
5. Considering the above facts, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the request of the petitioner in case if any specific complaint is received from the petitioner.
6. With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 02-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No YUVA
To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Madurai
2. Inspector Of Police, Thirunagar Police Station Madurai District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai __________
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 03:17:22 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 20603 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. YUVA CRL OP(MD) No. 20603 of 2026 02-11-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 03:17:22 pm )
CRL OP(MD) No. 20603 of 2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 03:17:22 pm )