Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/24851/2026 of Libin Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Boothapandy on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 24851 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 02-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 24851 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011541452026}

Libin

..Petitioner

Vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By,

The Inspector of Police,

Boothapandy Police Station,

Kanyakumari District.

(Crime No.409/2026.)

2. Ponnuswamy

..Respondents

PRAYER: This Petition filed under section Petition u/s 528 of BNSS to call for the records of the impugned FIR in Crime No.409 of 2026, dated 04.10.2026 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police and quash the same as illegal and pass such other or other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the nature and circumstances of the case.

For Petitioner

: M/s. K.Sasiprabha.

For R1

: B.Arun,

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

For R2

: Mr. R.Muthuram.

*****

__________

( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 11:23:28 am )

CRL OP(MD) No. 24851 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed by the sole accused in Crime No.409 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR wherein he was charged with the offence under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(2) of B.N.S., corresponding offences are Sections 294(b), 324 and 506 of IPC.

2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the de-facto complainant had agreed for quashing of the FIR.

3. Today, the de-facto complainant is present in-person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the F.I.R.

4. Considering the above said facts, F.I.R. in Crime No. 409 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police is hereby quashed. __________

( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 11:23:28 am )

CRL OP(MD) No. 24851 of 2026

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 02-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No jja __________

( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 11:23:28 am )

CRL OP(MD) No. 24851 of 2026 To:-

1. The Inspector of Police, Boothapandy Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. __________

( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 11:23:28 am )

CRL OP(MD) No. 24851 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. jja CRL OP(MD) No. 24851 of 2026 02-11-2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 04/11/2026 11:23:28 am )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead