Madras High Court
WP Crl.(MD)/5935/2026 of Tamilarasan Vs The District Superintendent of Police on 2 November 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5935 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5935 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011515522026}
Tamilarasan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Superintendent of Police Sivagangai District, Sivagangai
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
Sivagangai,
Sivagangai District
3. The Inspector of Police
Taluk Police Station,
Sivagangai,
Sivagangai District
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the History Sheet filed by the 3rd respondent against the petitioner based on the petitioner's complaint dated 22.08.2026.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr Pr Boomeerajan
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5935 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the History Sheet filed by the third respondent against the petitioner based on the petitioner's complaint dated 22.08.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.) accepts notice for the respondents.
3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by him seeking to cancel the history sheet opened against him by the third respondent is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered on its own merits within the time to be stipulated by this Court.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5935 of 2026
6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as any other interest party, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 02-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The District Superintendent of Police Sivagangai District Sivagangai
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Sivagangai Sivagangai District
3. The Inspector of Police Taluk Police Station Sivagangai Sivagangai District
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5935 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5935 of 2026 02-11-2026