Madras High Court
WP Crl.(MD)/5946/2026 of Vengadesalu Vs The State of Tamilnadu on 2 November 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5946 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5946 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011520822026}
Vengadesalu
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu
Rep.by the Superintendent of Police,
Trichy District,
Trichy
2. The State of Tamilnadu
Rep.by the Inspector of Police,
Thottiyam Police Station,
Trichy District
3. Vijayakumar
4. Boopathi,
5. Sekar,
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No.1 and 2 to give necessary police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and petitioner's company worker on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2026.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr A.Joel Paul Antony
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
for R1 & R2
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5946 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to give necessary police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and petitioner's company worker on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.) accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the remaining respondents is dispensed with.
3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking police protection to the petitioner and petitioner's company worker is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the based on the representation submitted by the petitioner, CSR was issued and enquiry is pending.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5946 of 2026
6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 01.09.2026 on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein, fifth respondent herein and any other interest party, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 02-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Superintendent of Police
Trichy
2. The Inspector of Police Thottiyam Police Station Trichy District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5946 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5946 of 2026 02-11-2026