Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/8921/2024 on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.8921 of 2024
Decided on: 4th November, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dharma Nand
…..Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Limited and others
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Harmender Singh, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been heard at this stage.
2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Tulsi Ram vs. Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Limited2 for claiming arrears of revised pay scale. It is an admitted position of the parties that aforesaid judgment is now pending consideration in review petition.
3. Taking note of the grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to decide the case of the petitioner for the redressal of the grievances raised herein within six weeks of
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.4427 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matters on 11.01.2024 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:11:49 :::CIS
2
the adjudication of the review petition. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances in accordance with law at an appropriate stage, in case necessity so arises in future.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 04, 2026
Judge Mukesh
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:11:49 :::CIS