Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19745/2026 on 4 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19745/2026 a/w connected matters
Decided on: 04.11.2026
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19745/2026
Veena Kashyap
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
2. CWP No. 19663/2026
Pushpender Pankaj
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
3. CWP No. 19661/2026
Arti
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
4. CWP No. 19640/2026
Anil Kumar & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
5. CWP No. 19639/2026
Usha Kumari
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
6. CWP No. 19638/2026
Ashok Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
7. CWP No. 19633/2026
Jagdish Chand
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
8. CWP No. 19595/2026
Poonam Kumari & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
9. CWP No. 19560/2026
Davinder Bhatia
…Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioners: M/s Sakshi, Mandeep Chandel, Vivek Thakur, Surender K. Sharma, Jagmohan Sharma, Ravneet Kumar and Kush Sharma, Advocates for the petitioners in the respective petitions.
For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024
2. Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that the aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No.205 of 2025 and other connected matters.
3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No.205 of 2025 and in terms thereof.
4. With the above observations, these writ petitions stand disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua 4th November, 2026
Judge rohit