Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19887/2026 on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.19887 of 2026
Decided on: 4th November, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Om Parkash Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
H.P. University and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Radhey Shyam Gautam, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Archna Dutt, learned counsel and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, respectively.
2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Dr. Hem Raj Sharma Versus Himachal Pradesh University and another2. His grievance is that the representation preferred 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.6284 of 2024, decided on 12.09.2025 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:12:52 :::CIS
2 by him in that regard on 05.08.2026 (Annexure P-11) has not been decided till date.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the aforesaid decision has been stayed vide order dated 11.03.2026 passed in LPA No.11 of 2026 (HPU Summerhill vs. Dr. Hem Raj Sharma & Anr.).
4. In view of above, without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-11) within six weeks after the decision in LPA No.11 of 2026 and in terms thereof.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 04, 2026
Judge Mukesh
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:12:52 :::CIS