Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19995/2026 on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:48724 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.19995 of 2025 Decided on: 04.11.2026 M/s HV Industries Plot No.137, Industrial Area Mehatput … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner: Mr. Rishabh Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State.
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:- “In view of the submission made hereinabove it is most humbly prayed that a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner and release/reimburse Net SGST in terms of the Industrial Policy 2019 in time bound manner, in the interest of justice and fair play.”
3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the relief prayed for, without making any observation on the merits of the case, we dispose of this petition with direction to
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:13:07 :::CIS
2026:HHC:48724 the respondents/Competent Authority that in case any application of the petitioner is pending before the concerned Authority qua reimbursement of any SGST, then, appropriate call be taken thereupon by the Authority within a period of eight weeks from today.
4. It is again clarified that we have not made any observation on merits of the case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge (Yogesh Jaswal) Judge
November 04, 2026 (Rishi) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:13:07 :::CIS