Himachal Pradesh High Court
RSA/615/2008 on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RSA No. 615 of 2008
Date of decision: 04.11.2026 Netar Singh
...Appellant.
Versus
Nain Singh deceased through his LRs
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant : Mr. Anup Rattan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shagun Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : In person.
Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral):
On 18.09.2026, in CMP No. 24344 of 2026, this Court has passed the following order: “Let notice be issued to the proposed legal representatives of the deceased respondent, as mentioned in para 4 of the application, returnable within four weeks on taking steps within three days.”
2. In sequel to the passing of said order, the proposed legal representatives of sole respondent Nain Singh, namely, Mohan Singh, Bhadher Singh and Balveer Singh, are present in the Court. It is contended by the said persons that the aforesaid appeal has been compromised inter se the parties and a photocopy of the compromise Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:13:58 :::CIS
-2-
deed has been placed on record as Exhibit C-1 along with the instant application. It has been further submitted by them that in view of the compromise, the present appeal, which has been filed by Shri Netar Singh, may be disposed of.
3. In view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, after substituting the names of Mohan Singh, Bhadher Singh and Balveer Singh in place of Nain Singh as party respondent No.1(a) to 1(c), the present application is allowed and the aforesaid persons are ordered to be impleaded as respondent No. 1(a) to 1(c).
RSA No.615 of 2008
4. Further, in view of the compromise placed on record, the present appeal is disposed of as having been compromised. The Registry is directed to prepare the decree sheet in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, which shall form part of the decree and is placed as Exhibit C-1.
5. In view of above, the present appeal stands disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 4th November, 2026.
(vt) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:13:58 :::CIS