Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1770/2026 on 4 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1770 of 2026 Decided on: 04.11.2026 _______________________________________________________________ Promila Devi
...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another ...Respondents _______________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr.
Virbahadur
Verma
and Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has produced instructions dated 03.11.2026, issued by the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid instructions reveals that as per the information received from the concerned DDO/Principal, the amount of arrear has been paid to the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the said factum, however, he submits that the amount of ACP
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:14:16 :::CIS
has not been paid to the petitioner.
4. This Court while disposing of CWP No.7985 of 2024, titled, Promila Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another, had only given direction to the respondents to decide the representation, so made by the petitioner within a period of six weeks. Thereafter, as per order dated 18.09.2025, a direction was given to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, in terms of office order dated 10.09.2025, if not already released, be released within six weeks.
5. Since the respondents have now released the amount of arrears, the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed has duly been complied with. Nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the action of the respondents, he may avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
th November
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:14:16 :::CIS