Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19447/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.19447 of 2026
Decided on: 3rd November, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Madan Lal
…..Petitioner
Versus
Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar H.P. Krishi Vishwavidyalaya and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Rana, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel and Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, respectively.
2. Petitioner seeks applicability of The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:15:49 :::CIS
2 preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition.
3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 03, 2026
Judge Mukesh
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:15:49 :::CIS