Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./774/2026 on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.774 of 2026 Decided on: 03.11.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Narender Kumar

...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. M.A. Safee and Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge

(Oral)

Learned Additional Advocate General has produced instructions dated 02.11.2026 issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1 and copy of office order dated 30.10.2026, passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary) Solan, District Solan (HP) along with other documents, which are taken on record.

2. A perusal of the aforesaid instructions reveals that the revised pension case of the petitioner has been prepared and sent to the office of the Accountant General

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:17:37 :::CIS

(A&E), Himachal Pradesh.

3. Further a perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that the promotional increment to the post of Head Teacher has been granted to the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arrears have not been released in favour of the petitioner.

4. Since the competent authority has passed an office order dated 30.10.2026, the mandate contained in the judgment has been complied with and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition. The respondents are directed to release the arrears in favour of the petitioner within eight weeks from today and in case the same are not released in his favour, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.

5. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

rd November, 2026

( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 03:17:37 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead