National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

EEPOS GMBH VS EEPOS Fine Rail Systems India Pvt. Ltd. & Others on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Interlocutory Application No.7983/2026 Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026 (F.No.13.07.2026/NCLAT/UR/06345) In the matter of: EEPOS GMBH .…. Appellant Vs. Fine Handling and Automation Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. .….Respondents Appearance: Anandh K, Advocate for the Appellant. 4 th November, 2026

(Hybrid Mode) This is an application to extend the time granted for curing the defects. The facts giving rise to present IA (re-filing) are that the Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 12.06.2026. The Office after scrutiny of the Memo of Appeal on 13.07.2026, intimated the defects to the Appellant on the same day. The Appellant re-filed the Appeal on 13.10.2026. It is stated in the IA that delay of 85 days in refiling of the Appeal occured due to genuine and unavoidable resons. The Appellant originally filed the Appeal well within the stipulated period, however, could not file the Appeal after curing the defects as noted by the Registry due to reasons unattributable to the Appellant, which is neither intentional nor deliberate, so the same may be condoned. Heard Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant and perused the averments made in the IA as well as Office report. The Appellant was required to re-file the Memo of Appeal within seven days from the date of intimation of the defects. However, the Appellant re-filed the Memo of Appeal with a delay of 85 days, hence, the case be placed before the Hon’ble Bench with defect for appropriate orders. List the case before the Hon’ble Bench under the heading ‘for admission with defect (fresh case)’. (Raj Kumar) Registrar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead