Central Administrative Tribunal

Sanjay Kumar vs UNION OF INDIA on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH

61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001

Order Sheet

Item no.: 7

O.A./4386/2026 (DELHI)

[ POSTING/TRANSFER ]

Court No.: 1

No of Adjournment:

Order Dated: 03/11/2026

SANJAY KUMAR

Vs

UNION OF INDIA

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Anit Pal Yadav, Mr. SN Sharma, Mr. Shakil Ahmed For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. U Srivastava Order of The Tribunal

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was appointed in the 17 Field Ammunition Depot, Ludhiana as Tradesman Mate on 19.03.2007. He was brought to Delhi on permanent posting to Vehicle Sub Depot, Delhi Cantt. on compassionate grounds on 17.02.2011. Since then he has been working in the said place, however, suddenly, the respondents have transferred him to 41 Field Ammunition Depot, Leh Ladakh on 14.08.2026 vide the impugned order. Aggrieved by the same, the applicant submitted a representation for cancellation of the said transfer and retention at New Delhi on medical and compassionate grounds dated 24.08.2026.

2. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. U Srivastava, learned counsel, who appears on advance service, accepts notice.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant apprehends that if the Tribunal does not interfere and grant the interim relief as prayed for by him by way of para 9 of the O.A., the applicant is likely to be shifted out on 10.11.2026 for further reporting at the new place of posting.

4. When the Tribunal was about to pass an order directing the respondents to consider his pending representation by way of a reasoned and speaking order before 10.11.2026 (the date when the applicant is likely to be relieved), the learned counsel for the respondents submits that he shall seek appropriate instructions from the department regarding the applicant's prayer for grant of interim relief and the retention in Delhi till the representation is decided.

5. List on 06.11.2026.

6. Order "dasti". B Anand Member (A) Deeksha Dhingra ( steno 'c' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead