Central Administrative Tribunal
Mohd qasim vs SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT on 27 October 2026
:: 1 ::
O.A. No. 61/1493/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Jammu Bench, Jammu
Hearing through video conferencing
Original Application No. 61/1493/2026
This the 27th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member Hon’ble Ms. Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member
1.
Mohd Qasim, aged about 53 years, S/o Mohd Safiq, R/o Chakiyan Mandi, District Poonch, UT of J&K. Presently serving as Master/Incharge Headmaster in the School Education Department-185101.
...Applicant
(Through Advocate: Mr. Gagan Kohli)
Versus
1.
UT of J&K through its Commissioner/Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
2.
Director, School Education, Jammu.
3.
Chief Education Officer, Poonch, District Poonch (Through Advocate: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, A.A.G.)
ARUN
KUMAR
:: 2 ::
O.A. No. 61/1493/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
(Per:- Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member)
At the outset, Mr. Gagan Kohli, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that this O.A. may be disposed of with direction to respondents to treat a copy of this O.A. as representation of the applicant for his posting/adjustment against a suitable available vacancy in District Poonch, preferably at ZEPO Mandi, Government Girls High School, Chandak or High School, Dingla, District Poonch, against an available vacancy while taking into consideration the fact that he is suffering from chronic bronchial asthma as is evident from the medical record issued through the office of the Chief Medical Officer, Poonch, advanced age, besides remaining service of approximately two and a half years.
2. Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned A.A.G. appearing on behalf of the respondents on advance notice seeks sometime to file reply.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this O.A. pending and same can be disposed of.
4. Accordingly, this O.A. is disposed of, at the admission stage itself, without entering into the merits of the case, with direction to respondents to treat a copy of this O.A. as representation of the applicant and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three weeks' from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A copy of the speaking order be communicated to the applicant.
ARUN KUMAR
:: 3 :: O.A. No. 61/1493/2026
5. There shall be no orders so as to costs.
(Pragya Sahay Saksena)
(Sanjeev Gupta)
Administrative Member
Judicial Member
Arun…
ARUN KUMAR