Central Administrative Tribunal
DR AAMIR NAZIR vs HEALTH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL SRINAGAR Order Sheet Item no.: 49 O.A./1239/2026 (SRINAGAR) [ CONTINUE ON THE POST ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 03/11/2026 DR AAMIR NAZIR Vs HEALTH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
For Applicant(s) Advocate : BHAT FAYAZ WITH MOHAMMAD ASIM
For Respondent(s) Advocate : SYED MUSAIB - DAG Order of The Tribunal 01/ Through the medium of this OA, the petitioner has sought extension of his engagement as Senior Resident in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PMR), Govt. Medical College, Baramulla. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, undoubtedly, the tenure of the petitioner is for one year, however, it is extendable upto maximum of three years. He further submits that leaving the tenure of the petitioner half way, the respondents have issued an addendum to the advertisement notification dated 22-10-2026, whereby one post of PMR has been incorporated therein. He submitted that in terms of S.O 364 dated 27-11-2022 read with Government order No. 38-JK (HME) of 2024 dated 26-02-2024, the petitioner has a right to continue upto three years. 02/ Learned counsel submitted that case of the petitioner has already been recommended by the concerned HOD for extention but the respondents have not considered the same and have issued the addendum supra. 03/ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 04/ Issue notice. 05/ Mr. Musaib - DAG appeared and waived notice. He shall file detailed reply in the matter by next date of hearing. 06/ List for consideration on 14-12-2026. It is made clear that the Registry shall not drop this case from the cases to be listed on the said date. 07/ Before parting, it needs a mention that while arguing the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner be provided a chance to file a representation before the competent authority to putforth his case and seeks its consideration. 08/ Prayer is allowed. Let the petitioner file a representation before the competent authority, who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with the rules and Government orders in vogue as also keeping in view the recommendations of the concerned HOD and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks' positively and for two weeks, the petitioner shall not be replaced by any similar arrangement. Prasant Kumar Member (A) M. S. Latif Member (J) Tariq Mota ( ps consultant )