Central Administrative Tribunal
Suraj Anant Vibhute vs WESTERN RAILWAY on 3 November 2026
1 OA No. 861/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Mumbai Bench, Mumbai
Original Application No. 861/2026
Dated this Tuesday, the 03rd day of November, 2026
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
Mr. Suraj Anant Vibhute,
Age: 46 years,
Working as Senior Section Engineer,
EMU Workshop, Mahalaxmi, Western Railway, Residing at: MSRB-II, 91/03, Railway Colony, Kurla (East), Mumbai- 400 024.
Mobile: 9867474220
Email: vibhute.suraj@gmail.com
...Applicant
(By Adv: Shri V A Nagrani)
Versus
1. Union of India,
Through the General Manager,
Western Railway,
Churchgate, Mumbai- 400 020.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager (E)
Western Railway,
Mumbai Central,
Mumbai- 400 008.
…Respondents
(By Adv: Dr. Vinay S Masurkar)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
At the outset, on the basis of advance copy, learned counsel for the official respondents, Dr. Masurkar C=IN, O=Personal, T=0779, OID.2.5.4.65= e43eb0e1e71d4e88b0ea71809694b4a7, Phone= bdfff08227607de07cc8a71f87733e1252492d43d bcae4331895b03a11e5f3ff, PostalCode= 110082, S=Delhi, SERIALNUMBER= 5482fa3c129a1d4f404f610355a98ceb9582ace2c 33499b071497409a4527c20, CN=Rashmi I am the author of this document Rashmi 2 OA No. 861/2026
points out that looking to the verification clause available at Page No. 21, it is apparent that applicant is verifying the contents of the rejoinder, whereas, the present original applicant is under consideration at the Admission stage and this error is fatal according to him.
2. Facing with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the applicant fairly submits that although it is an inadvertent error, however, he may be permitted to withdraw the present original application with liberty to file the fresh original application in accordance with the rules.
3. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, Original Application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file the fresh Original Application.
4. With the aforesaid, the OA is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending MAs, if any, shall stand disposed of. No order as to cost.
(Umesh Gajankush) Member (J)
R.
C=IN, O=Personal, T=0779, OID.2.5.4.65= e43eb0e1e71d4e88b0ea71809694b4a7, Phone= bdfff08227607de07cc8a71f87733e1252492d43d bcae4331895b03a11e5f3ff, PostalCode= 110082, S=Delhi, SERIALNUMBER= 5482fa3c129a1d4f404f610355a98ceb9582ace2c 33499b071497409a4527c20, CN=Rashmi I am the author of this document Rashmi