Central Administrative Tribunal
Reeta Rajesh Pandey vs M/O DEFENCE on 30 October 2026
1 CP No.34/2026 in
OA No.519/2017
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
MUMBAI BENCH, MUMBAI
CONTEMPT PETITION No.34/2026
in
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.519/2017
Date of Decision: 30th October, 2026
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. SHRI KRISHNA, MEMBER (A)
HON’BLE MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH, MEMBER (J)
Mrs. Reeta Rajesh Pandey
Age : 45 years,
Residing at : E-2/401, Royal Park,
B-Cabin Road, Bhavani Chowk,
Behind Navre Nagar, Ambarnath (East),
Thane – 421 501.
Email:rp7276281003@gmail.com
Phone No.9699802991
... Petitioner
( By Advocate Ms. Bhoomika Vyas i/b Shri Sangram Chinnappa )
Versus
1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh
The Secretary,
Ministry of Defence,
Union of India,
South Block,
New Delhi – 110 011.
2. Vice Admiral Gurcharan Singh
The Chief of Personnel
Integrated Headquarters of MoD (Navy)
Sena Bhavan, New Delhi – 110 011.
3. Rear Admiral Ajay Patney
The Admiral Superintendent
Naval Dockyard,
Shahid Bhagat Singh Road,
Mumbai – 400 023.
… Respondents/
Contemnors
(By Advocate Shri P. Khosla)
Digitally signed by Milan Jackson Alphanso DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=1625, OID.2.5.4.65=
399aa54d40324576850c692c7a861e1e, Phone=
30f7d919c844ed7f75e7bc56633df96108338768adae5582338f0d13d4f0f1dc, PostalCode=401203, S=Maharashtra, SERIALNUMBER=
6b7c9269fe100118bd94c76380691e4802b189a40578bdd0fd757c8b8babf6f4, CN=Milan Jackson Alphanso Reason: I am the author of this document Location:
Date: 2026.11.04 09:59:16+05'30'
Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2024.4.0
Milan Jackson
Alphanso
2 CP No.34/2026 in
OA No.519/2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Per : Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (A)
Learned counsel for the Contempt Petitioner submits that the applicant has received all the payments due to her and, therefore, the order of the Tribunal has been complied.
2. In view of the above submission of learned counsel for the Contempt Petitioner, the Contempt Petition stands closed. Notices are discharged.
(Umesh Gajankush)
(Shri Krishna) Member (J)
Member (A)
ma* Digitally signed by Milan Jackson Alphanso DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=1625, OID.2.5.4.65= 399aa54d40324576850c692c7a861e1e, Phone= 30f7d919c844ed7f75e7bc56633df96108338768adae5582338f0d13d4f0f1dc, PostalCode=401203, S=Maharashtra, SERIALNUMBER= 6b7c9269fe100118bd94c76380691e4802b189a40578bdd0fd757c8b8babf6f4, CN=Milan Jackson Alphanso Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.11.04 09:59:16+05'30' Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2024.4.0 Milan Jackson Alphanso