Central Administrative Tribunal
Anil Kumar Roy vs ECONOMIC AFFAIRS on 30 October 2026
1 CP No.36/2023 in
OA No.670/2022
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
MUMBAI BENCH, MUMBAI
CONTEMPT PETITION No.36/2023
in
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.670/2022
Date of Decision: 30th October, 2026
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. SHRI KRISHNA, MEMBER (A)
HON’BLE MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH, MEMBER (J)
Anil Kumar Roy
Age 38 years, Ex MTS
Securities Appellate Tribunal,
Mumbai.
Residing at : Room No.5254,
Block No.143, CGS Colony, S.N.
Plot, Sector-7, Antop Hill,
Mumbai – 400037
Mob:7506620421
... Petitioner
( By Advocate Shri Vicky Nagrani )
Versus
1. Union of India,
Through the Secretary, Mr. Ajay Seth,
Department of Economic Affairs,
251, North Block,
New Delhi – 110 001.
2. Ministry of Finance,
Under Secretary,Mr. Dinesh Changrani,
Government of India, North Block,
New Delhi – 110 001.
3. The Registrar,
Mr. Mahesh S. Lone
Securities Appellate Tribunal,
14th Floor, Earnest House,
Nariman Point,
Mumbai – 400 021.
… Respondents/
Contemnors
(By Advocate Shri N.K. Rajpurohit )
Digitally signed by Milan Jackson Alphanso DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=1625, OID.2.5.4.65=
399aa54d40324576850c692c7a861e1e, Phone=
30f7d919c844ed7f75e7bc56633df96108338768adae5582338f0d13d4f0f1dc, PostalCode=401203, S=Maharashtra, SERIALNUMBER=
6b7c9269fe100118bd94c76380691e4802b189a40578bdd0fd757c8b8babf6f4, CN=Milan Jackson Alphanso Reason: I am the author of this document Location:
Date: 2026.11.04 10:11:46+05'30'
Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2024.4.0
Milan Jackson
Alphanso
2 CP No.36/2023 in
OA No.670/2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Per : Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (A)
The Contempt Petitioner has filed the Contempt Petition for non-compliance of judgement of the Tribunal passed in OA No.670/2022 dated 06.09.2022. However, later on, the respondents have filed Review Application No.13/2025 which was allowed vide order dated 09.09.2026 passed by this Tribunal.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents Shri Rajpurohit submits that since the Review Application of the respondents has been allowed, therefore, the original order is no more in existence. Therefore, the Contempt Petition does not survive.
3. In view of the above submission, the Contempt Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Notices are discharged.
(Umesh Gajankush)
(Shri Krishna) Member (J)
Member (A)
ma* Digitally signed by Milan Jackson Alphanso DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=1625, OID.2.5.4.65= 399aa54d40324576850c692c7a861e1e, Phone= 30f7d919c844ed7f75e7bc56633df96108338768adae5582338f0d13d4f0f1dc, PostalCode=401203, S=Maharashtra, SERIALNUMBER= 6b7c9269fe100118bd94c76380691e4802b189a40578bdd0fd757c8b8babf6f4, CN=Milan Jackson Alphanso Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026.11.04 10:11:46+05'30' Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2024.4.0 Milan Jackson Alphanso