Central Administrative Tribunal

James Sebastian Rozario vs Department of Information and Technology on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 5 O.A./860/2026 (MUMBAI) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 02/11/2026 JAMES SEBASTIAN ROZARIO Vs DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. V.P Shirke For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. N K Rajpurohit Order of The Tribunal Heard learned counsel for the applicant on the question of Admission as well as on Interim Relief.

2. Shri Rajpurohit, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and waives service.

3. It is the case of the applicant that in earlier round of litigation in OA No. 439/2026, this Tribunal vide order dated 30.09.2026 directed the respondents to consider the representation of the applicant in pursuance of the aforesaid impugned order dated 27.10.2026 (Annexure-A-1), has been passed by the authority. 3.1 It is submitted that in terms of directions issued by this Tribunal in earlier round of litigation, the said authority has not considered the representation of the applicant. In this view of the matter, Interim Relief may be granted to the applicant.

4. On the other hand, on the basis of advance instructions, learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has not recieved the copy of OA physically up till now.

4.1 He further submits that as per the instructions provided by the Department, the applicant has already been relieved and therefore, some reasonable time may be granted to the Department to file the reply or argue the case on the point of Interim Relief.

5. Taking note of the submission of learned counsel for the respondents, list the matter on 05.11.2026 for consideration on Interim Relief. MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH Member (J) Rashmi ( )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead