Gujarat High Court
MCACP/169/1993 of KANDLA PORT WORKERS' UNION Vs JOINT MANAGER (OPERATION) on 13 November 1995
OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 1993. Date of decision:13.11.1995. For approval and signature The Honourable Mr. Justice S.M.Soni and The Honourable Mr. Justice R.R. Jain Mr. H.J. Nanavati, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Thakkar, advocate for the respondent. 1.
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 1993.
Date of decision:13.11.1995.
For approval and signature
The Honourable Mr. Justice S.M.Soni
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice R.R. Jain
Mr. H.J. Nanavati, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.M. Thakkar, advocate for the respondent.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of judgment?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
��Coram: S.M. Soni & R.R.Jain, JJ.
��---------------------------
��November 13, 1995.
Oral judgment (Per Soni, J)
This court, in M.C.A.Nos.225/90, 291/90, 1022/90 and 1285/90 has held that Section 7 and 7A of the Industrial Disputes Act are pari materia and Industrial Tribunal is not a court subordinate to this court in the sense the Contempt of Courts Act makes provision requiring the High Court to deal with the contempt of its subordinate courts. The point involved in this petition is also covered by the aforementioned judgment. Moreover,in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of the Alahar Cooperative Credit Service Society v. Sham Lal, 1995 (2) GLH, 550, this petition is not maintainable. Hence, petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs.