Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/8209/2010 on 29 December 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 8209/2010 a/w CWP Nos.
8210, 8211 and 8222 of 2010
Decided on: 29.12.2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 8209 of 2010
Radha Sharma Versus State of H.P. and ors.
2. CWP No. 8210 of 2010
Barfi Devi
Versus State of H.P. and ors.
3. CWP No. 8211 of 2010
Duni Chand Versus State of H.P. and ors.
4. CWP No. 8222 of 2010
Purshottam Ram Versus State of H.P. and ors.
Coram :
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the petitioners:
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, vice Mr. R.S.
Gautam, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G with Mr. Ankus Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G.
Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral):
The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “ i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or order may kindly be issued directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Junior Basic Teacher (JBT) w.e.f. 01.01.208 instead of 26.02.2009 and further the petitioner be held entitled for the consequential financial benefits and seniority etc.”
2. We are informed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13006-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:05:11 :::CIS
2 petitioners by the decision of this Court in CWP (T) No. 8194 of 2008, titled Bhagat Ram and others Versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 16.11.2010. There will be a direction to the second respondent to examine the matter in light of the judgment, referred to above, and take appropriate action in accordance with law. This shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned.
3. With these observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any.
Copy dasti.
(Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice
(Justice V.K. Sharma), December 29, 2010
Judge (VT/pankaj)
High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13006-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:05:11 :::CIS