Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/12004/2008 on 29 December 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No.12004 of 2008.
Decided on: 29.12.2010.
Raj Pal.
……….Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner. : Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral)
The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that his case for regularization has not been considered. It has come in the reply that the case of the petitioner was sent for sanction to the respondents-State and the same was under active consideration when the reply was filed on 21.07.2005.
2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization as undertaken, if not already considered, within a period of two months after production of 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No. High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13084 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:08:50 :::CIS
2 certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, from due date with all consequential benefits. The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma)
Judge
December 29, 2010.
(krt)
High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13084 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:08:50 :::CIS