Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/12278/2008 on 29 December 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP (T) No.12278/2008 Decided on:29.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Ravinder Singh.
…Petitioner.
Versus The Principal Secretary (Education) and others. …Respondents.
________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the petitioner : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General.
_____________________________________________________
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral).
Petitioner claims that his father was working as Part Time Water Carrier. He died on 21.10.2004. He is seeking compassionate appointment after the death of his father.
2. Mr. Vinod Thakur submits that the State has not framed any scheme for offering compassionate appointment after the death of a Part Time Water Carrier. He further submits that the compassionate appointment is offered to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13052 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:09:26 :::CIS
2 level of daily wage employees, who had completed five years service.
3. Since there is no provision for offering compassionate appointment after the death of Part Time Water Carrier, this Court cannot issue any direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment, after the death of his father, who was working as a Part Time Water Carrier.
4. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma),
Judge 29.12.2010 *awasthi* High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13052 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:09:26 :::CIS