Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/12320/2008 on 29 December 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No. 12320 of 2008.
Decided on: 29th December, 2010. Narender Kumar Sharma and Others. …Petitioners.
-Versus- State of H. P. and Others.
…Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate.
For respondent No. 1. : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General with Mr. R.P.
Singh, Assistant Advocate
General. For respondents No. 2 and 3.
: Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral):
Petitioners have already made a representation with regard to removal of pay anomalies. The same has been rejected vide Annexure A-7, dated 09.11.2004. Once the representation has been made by the petitioners, the same ought to have been considered and decided by passing a speaking/detailed order. The competent authority was required to take into consideration all the pleas/grounds taken by the petitioners in the representation with regard to the redressal of their grievances pertaining to removal of pay anomalies.
2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-7, dated 09.11.2004 is quashed and set aside. The Board of Directors, H.P. State Co-Operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. is directed to decide the representation made by the petitioners on 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No.
14.06.2004 afresh by passing a speaking/detailed order after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. While deciding the representation, the Board of Directors shall also take into consideration the documents annexed with this petition. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma)
Judge December 29, 2010. (bhupender)