Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/8134/2010 on 28 December 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 8134 of 2010 a/w CWP Nos.
8143, 8144, 8145, 8146, 8147, 8148, 8150, 8151, 8152, 8153, 8154, 8155, 8156, 8159 &
Date of decision: 28.12.2010.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 8134 of 2010
Sant Ram
Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
2. CWP No. 8143 of 2010
Birbal
Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
3. CWP No. 8144 of 2010
Kishori Lal Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
4. CWP No. 8145 of 2010
Jagat Ram Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
5. CWP No. 8146 of 2010
Ami Chand Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
6. CWP No. 8147 of 2010
Chain Singh Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
7. CWP No. 8148 of 2010
Mangat Ram Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
8. CWP No. 8150 of 2010
Dalip Singh Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
9. CWP No. 8151 of 2010
Jonda Ram Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
10. CWP No. 8152 of 2010
Amar Singh Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
11. CWP No. 8153 of 2010
Jaisi Ram Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
CWP No. 8154 of 2010
Jagar Nath Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
13. CWP No. 8155 of 2010
Kirlu Ram Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
14. CWP No. 8156 of 2010
Jamila Biwi Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
15. CWP No. 8159 of 2010
Filtha Ram Versus
State of H.P. and ors.
16. CWP No. 8199 of 2010
Ishro Ram Versus
State of H.P. and anr.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge.
For the Petitioner (s) : M/s. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, L.N.Sharma and Ajay Mohan
Goel, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G.
Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
The issue raised in these writ petitions pertains to the question whether 50% of the daily waged service is liable to be counted as qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary benefits.
2. We are informed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue is covered in favour of the petitioners by the decision of this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh & others vs. Sarab Dayal in CWP No.180 of 2001 decided on 19.7.2007.
3. It is pointed out that the matter is pending before the Apex Court. The parties agree that they will also be bound by the outcome of the decision, now pending before the Apex Court, so that the case also need not be taken to the Apex Court. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of, making it clear that in case the decision of this Court is implemented in the case of the similarly situated persons, in the case of the petitioners herein also, the judgment will be implemented expeditiously subject to the result of the matter pending before the Apex Court. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the case and, therefore, it will be certainly open to the Authority concerned to examine whether on facts Sarab Datyal’s case would apply to the petitioners.
Dasti copy.
(Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice
(Justice V.K. Ahuja), December 28, 2010
Judge (tilak/pankaj)