Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/8170/2010 on 28 December 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA.
CWP Nos. 8170 & 8182 of 2010.
Decided on: 28th December, 2010.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 8170 of 2010
Jai Lal and ors. Versus
State of H.P. & ors.
2. CWP No. 8182 of 2010
Sunder Ram and ors. Versus
State of H.P. & ors.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge.
For the petitioners : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General,
with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.
A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
The petitioners claim work charge status/regularistion with all consequential benefits benefits from the date they completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 313.
2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file individual representation furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:12947-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:11:08 :::CIS
2 petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representation.
3. The writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
Dasti copy.
(Justice Kurian Joseph),
Chief Justice
28th December, 2010
(Justice V.K. Ahuja),
(Tilak/pankaj)
Judge. High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:12947-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:11:08 :::CIS