Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/11653/2011 on 28 December 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA.
CWP No. 11653 of 2011.
Decided on: 28th December, 2011.
_____________________________________________________
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Tejbir Singh son of Shri Zalam Singh, resident of Village and Post Office Bharog Baneri, Tehsil Poanta Sahib, District Sirmour, H. P. present working as D.M. at G.S.S.S.
Jamta, District Sirmour, H. P.
2. Gulab Singh son of Shri Basanta Ram, resident of village Matak Majri, PO Majra, Tehsil Poanta Sahib, District Sirmour, H. P. presently working as P.E.T. at G.S.S.S.
Majra, District Sirmour, H. P.
3. Manmohan Singh son of Shri Jeet Singh, resident of Village and Post Office Shivpur, Tehsil Poanta Sahib, District Sirmlour, H. P. presently working as D.M. at G.S..S.S. Jamta, District Sirmlour, H. P.
. …Petitioner.
Versus
1. State of H.P. through Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla 171002.
2. Director of Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171003.
3. Deputy Director Elementary Education, District Sirmour at Nahan, H. P. & others
… Respondents. _____________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge.
For the petitioner : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General
with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG and Mr.
Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate
General. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11664-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:12:32 :::CIS
Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. As prayed for, it is open for the petitioner to bring this fact to the notice of the respondents, who shall examine the same. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith his representation and a copy of the writ petition as well as a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner.
2. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Justice Kurian Joseph),
Chief Justice
28th December, 2011.
(Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (R/jai)
Judge. High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11664-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:12:32 :::CIS