Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/11686/2011 on 28 December 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 11686 of 2011-I
Date of Decision 28th December, 2011
________________________________________________________
Chand Kishore son of Shri Pune Ram, resident of Village Rambi, Phati Kalwari, Post Office Kalwari, Kothi Palach, Tehsil Banjar, District Kullu, H. P. presently working as Peon in the office of District Attorney, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
….Petitioner.
Versus.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation Limited through its Managing Director, Shimla H. P.
2. Divisional Manager, Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation limited Forest Working Division, Kullyu, District Kullu, H. P.
3. The District Attorney Kullu, District Kullu, H. P.
….Respondents.
Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. _______________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. ________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner
: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate.
For respondent No.3 : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate
General with Mr. J. K. Verma,
Dy. Advocate General and
Mr. Ankush Dass, Sood, Addl.
Advocate General. __________________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (oral)
The whole case of the petitioner is that there is concluded proceedings as per the order of the Tribunal both on High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11666-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:12:38 :::CIS
2 the original side and in execution and therefore, the same cannot be reopened by the Corporation. Those orders are not placed on the file. The petitioner should not file the writ petition without producing those orders since the whole case turns around only on those orders. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate writ petition with the supporting material.
2. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Justice Kurian Joseph)
Chief Justice.
(Justice Dev Darshan Sud),
Judge .
December 28,2011 (R/Jai) High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11666-DB ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:12:38 :::CIS