Himachal Pradesh High Court
CR.R/217/2011 on 28 December 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA.
Criminal Revision No. 217 of 2011.
Date of decision: 28.12.2011.
_______________________________________________________
Sh. Sita Ram s/o Sh. Beli Ram, R/o Village Shamoh (Kaneta), Pargana Sandhurt, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan,H.P.
….. Petitioner.
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sh. Sant Kumar s/o Late Sh. Nand Lal, r/o Village Sai, Tehsil and Police Station, Arki, Distt. Solan, HP.
…..Respondent.
2. State of H.P.
….Proforma respondent.
Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 03.09.2010 passed by Ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Arki, in Case No. 142/2 of 2003 titled as “State of H.P. vs Sh. Sant Ram” whereby the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the charges under Section 406, 420, 451, 461, 462 and 120B IPC, with the prayer to set aside the same being illegal and contrary to the facts.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the Petitioner : Mr. V.S.Chauhan,Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nainta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl.A.G. with Mr. J.S.Rana, Asstt. A.G. for proforma respondent No.2.
Kuldip Singh, Judge (Oral).
The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that in view of amendment in Cr.P.C., appeal is maintainable instead of __________________ Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11625 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:13:29 :::CIS
…2…
revision and, therefore, a submission has been made that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to file appeal against the impugned judgment. Not opposed. The revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings against the impugned judgment.
December 28, 2011.
(Kuldip Singh), ( Krt)
Judge.
High Court of H.P. 2011:HHC:11625 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 12:13:29 :::CIS