Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWPOA/12260/2008 on 29 December 2010

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

CWP(T) No.12260 of 2008.

Decided on: 29.12.2010.

Kamlesh Kalia.

……….Petitioner.

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh & another.

……….Respondents.

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General.

Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral)

Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any.

(Rajiv Sharma)

Judge

December 29, 2010.

(krt)

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13056 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 22:45:08 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead