Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/13864/2008 on 29 December 2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No.: 13864 of 2008.
Decided on: 29.12.2010. __________________________________________________________
Smt. Laxmi Sharma.
… Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. and others.
… Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.4.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral):
Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed the copy of communication dated 22nd September, 2009 on record, addressed by the Director of Health Services, Himachal Pradesh to the Principal Secretary (Health) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh for perusal of the Court. Same is permitted to be taken on record. According to the contents of this letter petitioner’s name was reflected at Sr. No.61 in the final seniority list as it stood on 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 22:45:17 :::CIS
- 2 - 31.5.2006 meaning thereby she is senior to Smt. Padma Verma, Saroj Sharma, Indu Bala and Ratni Bhardwaj.
2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Matron in view of letter dated 22nd September, 2009, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment, with all consequential benefits. It is made clear that the State Government shall initiate the process by informing respondent No.4 with regard to promotion of the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma),
Judge. December 29, 2010. (sck). High Court of H.P. 2010:HHC:13021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/11/2026 22:45:17 :::CIS