Madras High Court

WP CRL./2652/2026 of City Union Bank Ltd. Vs The Tahsildar on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04-11-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012285582026}

M/s.City Union Bank Limited,

Credit Recovery and Management Department, Represented by its Chief Manager & Authorised Officer, Mr.K.Balamurugan, Administrative Office at No.24-B, Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam – 612 001.

.. Petitioner(s)

Vs.

1. The Tahsildar,

Taluk Office, Marakkanam Taluk,

Villupuram District.

2.The Surveyor,

Land Survey Branch, Tahsildar Office,

Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

3.The Superintendent of Police,

Villupuram District, Master Plan Complex, Moovendar Nagar, Villupuram.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Marakkanam Sub-Division, Marakkanam,

Villupuram District.

5.The Inspector of Police,

Marakkanam Police Station, Marakkanam,

Villupuram District.

6.J.Murugan

.. Respondent(s)

WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026

PRAYER: To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondent Nos.3 to 5 to provide adequate police protection to survey, measure, and demarcate the petition schedule property situated in New Survey No.254/11 (Old Survey No.269/11), measuring an extent of 0.12.5 Hectares (28.5 cents/12,426 sq.ft), Anumandhai Village, Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District by the respondents Nos.1 and 2 pursuant to the application receipt dated 06.06.2025.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.RA.Gopinath

For Respondent(s):

Mr.B.Prasanth Nadaraj

Government Advocate for RR 1 & 2

Mr.Arun Anbumani

Additional Public Prosecutor for RR 3 to 5

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.RA.Gopinath reported that the petitioner has assigned the amount to ARCIL. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is left open to ARCIL to take appropriate proceedings as the Writ Petition (Criminal) is dismissed as infructuous. 04-11-2026 krk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026 To

1. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

2. The Surveyor, Land Survey Branch, Tahsildar Office, Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Master Plan Complex, Moovendar Nagar, Villupuram.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Marakkanam Sub-Division, Marakkanam, Villupuram District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Marakkanam Police Station, Marakkanam, Villupuram District.

6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. krk WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026

04.11.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead