Madras High Court
WP CRL./2652/2026 of City Union Bank Ltd. Vs The Tahsildar on 4 November 2026
WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04-11-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012285582026}
M/s.City Union Bank Limited,
Credit Recovery and Management Department, Represented by its Chief Manager & Authorised Officer, Mr.K.Balamurugan, Administrative Office at No.24-B, Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam – 612 001.
.. Petitioner(s)
Vs.
1. The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office, Marakkanam Taluk,
Villupuram District.
2.The Surveyor,
Land Survey Branch, Tahsildar Office,
Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District.
3.The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram District, Master Plan Complex, Moovendar Nagar, Villupuram.
4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Marakkanam Sub-Division, Marakkanam,
Villupuram District.
5.The Inspector of Police,
Marakkanam Police Station, Marakkanam,
Villupuram District.
6.J.Murugan
.. Respondent(s)
WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026
PRAYER: To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondent Nos.3 to 5 to provide adequate police protection to survey, measure, and demarcate the petition schedule property situated in New Survey No.254/11 (Old Survey No.269/11), measuring an extent of 0.12.5 Hectares (28.5 cents/12,426 sq.ft), Anumandhai Village, Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District by the respondents Nos.1 and 2 pursuant to the application receipt dated 06.06.2025.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.RA.Gopinath
For Respondent(s):
Mr.B.Prasanth Nadaraj
Government Advocate for RR 1 & 2
Mr.Arun Anbumani
Additional Public Prosecutor for RR 3 to 5
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.RA.Gopinath reported that the petitioner has assigned the amount to ARCIL. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is left open to ARCIL to take appropriate proceedings as the Writ Petition (Criminal) is dismissed as infructuous. 04-11-2026 krk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No
WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026 To
1. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District.
2. The Surveyor, Land Survey Branch, Tahsildar Office, Marakkanam Taluk, Villupuram District.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Master Plan Complex, Moovendar Nagar, Villupuram.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Marakkanam Sub-Division, Marakkanam, Villupuram District.
5. The Inspector of Police, Marakkanam Police Station, Marakkanam, Villupuram District.
6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.
WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. krk WP.Crl.No.2652 of 2026
04.11.2026