Madras High Court
WP Crl.(MD)/2077/2026 of M.Veerasamy Vs The State of Tamilnadu on 4 November 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 2077 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 2077 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD010522912026}
M.Veerasamy
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu
Rep by The Superintendent of Police,
Trichy District,.
Trichy.
2. The Deputy Superitendent of Police
Manapparai Division,
Trichy District.
3. The Inspector of Police
Vaiyampatty Police Station,
Trichy District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 07.04.2026 to close the History Sheet which was opened in the name of the petitioner in H.S No.2/2026 on the file of the third respondent.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr. A.N.Ramanathan
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
WP Crl.(MD) No. 2077 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 07.04.2026 to close the History Sheet which was opened in the name of the petitioner in H.S No.2/2026 on the file of the third respondent.
2. It the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the representation submitted by the petitioner to close the history sheet in H.S.No.2 of 2026 opened in the name of the petitioner by the third respondent has not been considered so far. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking appropriate direction.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing for the respondents would submit that the representation submitted by the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.
4. Considering the limited scope of the prayer, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, directs the first and second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation on merits after issuing notice to the petitioner and pass appropriate order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 2077 of 2026
5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 04-11-2026 Index: Yes/No (2/2) Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Superintendent of Police Trichy District Trichy
2. The Deputy Superitendent of Police Manapparai Division Trichy District
3. The Inspector of Police Vaiyampatty Police Station Trichy District
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 2077 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 2077 of 2026 04-11-2026 (2/2)