Madras High Court

WP(MD)/31410/2026 of Arulmigu Munaiyaduvar Nainar Temple Vs The Joint Commissioner on 4 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 31410 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 04-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 31410 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011560622026}

and

WMP(MD) No. 24129 of 2026

Arulmigu Munaiyaduvar Nainar Temple,

Represented through its Managing Trustee, S.Manickam Pillai, S/o.Kamatchi Pillai, Door No. 3/98/7, Malaiya Koil Opposite, Silvarpatti, Periakulam Taluk, Theni District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Joint Commissioner.

Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious

and Charitable Endowment Department,

Dindigul.

2. The Executive Officer,

Arulmigu Mooongilanai

Kamatchiamman Temple,

Devadhanapatti,

Periakulam Taluk,

Theni District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent dated 21.10.2026, quashing the same as arbitrary, ultravires, in violation of the principles of natural justice, Audi Alteram Partem and consequentially permitting to conduct the necessary election for electing the trustees for oncoming period of two years in respect of the trusteeship of Arulmighu

WP(MD) No. 31410 of 2026

Munaiyaduvar Nainar Temple, Silvarpatti, Periakulam Taluk, Theni District.

For Petitioner

: Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh

For Respondents

: Mr.M.S.Parthiban

Government Advocate

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Communication dated 21.10.2026 from the Fit Person calling upon the petitioner to hand over properties, documents and the like in relation to the Arulmigu Munaiyaduvar Nainar Temple is challenged in this Writ Petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned communication makes reference to an order of the Joint Commissioner, but that such order was not served on the petitioner and that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity.

3. Mr.M.S.Parthiban, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for both the respondents. He has handed over a copy of order dated 01.10.2026 of the Joint Commissioner.

WP(MD) No. 31410 of 2026

4. Since it appears prima facie that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity before the appointment of the Fit Person, the Fit Person shall take no further steps pursuant to the impugned communication until the next hearing date.

5. List on 03.12.2026. 04-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No JEN To

1. The Joint Commissioner. Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Dindigul.

2. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Mooongilanai Kamatchiamman Temple, Devadhanapatti, Periakulam Taluk, Theni District.

WP(MD) No. 31410 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. JEN WP(MD) No. 31410 of 2026 04-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead