Madras High Court
WP Crl.(MD)/5984/2026 of RM Saravanan Vs The Superintendent of Police on 3 November 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5984 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03-11-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5984 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011544942026}
RM Saravanan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
O/o, Superintendent of Police,
Thanjaur District
2. The Inspector of Police,
Medial College Police Station,
Thanjavur District
3. C.Ramasamy,
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to take action on the petitioner’s complaint based on receipt in CSR No.152 of 2026 dated 17.02.2026, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr Yogeshwar D
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to take action on the petitioner’s complaint based on receipt in
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5984 of 2026 CSR No.152 of 2026 dated 17.02.2026, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.), takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Since no adverse order is going to be passed, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with.
3. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite issuance of CSR, no action was taken on his complaint. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that enquiry is pending.
6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to conduct enquiry on the petitioner’s complaint, after issuing notice to the petitioner herein, third respondent and any other interested parties. Upon enquiry, if any
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5984 of 2026 cognizable offence is made out, take appropriate action in accordance with law. The outcome of the enquiry shall be communicated to the petitioner. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 03-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Superintendent of Police O/o, Superintendent of Police Thanjaur District
2. The Inspector of Police Medial College Police Station Thanjavur District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5984 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5984 of 2026 03-11-2026