Madras High Court

WP Crl.(MD)/5988/2026 of Sankar Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep by on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5988 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 03-11-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5988 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011545522026}

Sankar

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu rep by

The Inspector of Police,

Tiruppathur Town Police Station,

Sivagangai District

2. Mahalakshmi,

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to return the petitioner's passport which was illegally detained by the 2nd respondent and take appropriate legal action against the 2nd respondent, based on his complaint dated 29.09.2026 within stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner(s)

:Mr. G.Hari Haran

For Respondent(s)

:Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi

Additional Public Prosecutor

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to return the petitioner's passport which is allegedly being detained by the

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5988 of 2026 2nd respondent and take appropriate legal action against the 2nd respondent, based on his complaint dated 29.09.2026 within stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police, on instructions, would submit that based on the petitioner’s complaint, enquiry was conducted and after due enquiry, the complaint was closed.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that though complaint was closed, the petitioner's passport has not yet been returned to him. Hence, he seeks appropriate directions from this Court.

4. Considering the submissions made on either side, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's request for return of his passport and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the passport is not required for any other purpose, the same shall be returned to the petitioner forthwith. .

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5988 of 2026

5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 03-11-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To

1. The Inspector of Police Tiruppathur Town Police Station Sivagangai District

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5988 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5988 of 2026 03-11-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead